Fund Intelligence Diagnosis
Evaluated across 73 positions · Updated Jun 2026
What both layers are telling you
The fund has genuine alpha generation ability (IC 8.1, chasing discipline 8.4) but is sabotaging it through two structural failures: capital is allocated to positions without sound reasoning (sizing 4.9, transfer coefficient 3.5 mirrors 75% lucky wins), and execution discipline collapses between trades (consistency 0.6, rolling IC std dev 0.213 drifting).
Recommended actions
Mandate pre-entry thesis scoringHigh Impact
Require a written mechanism and timeline before sizing. 46% of winning trades currently carry the wrong thesis.
Cap discretionary sizing varianceHigh Impact
Sizing discipline scores 4.9. Tie position size to thesis score to lift transfer coefficient from 3.5.
Standardize mid-thesis reviewsHigh Impact
Consistency is 0.6 with rolling IC drifting (σ 0.213). Trigger a review at every 10% adverse move.